A tale of user-friendliness with "hg merge" and "hg rollback".

[Rob Landley]

On Tuesday 13 October 2009 10:45:53 Abderrahim Kitouni wrote:
> From what you're saying, I feel you want to transplant [1] that change
> rather than merging the branch contains it (which happens to contain
> just one commit).
>
> (FWIW, a transplant operation is basically an export/import)
>
> [1] http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/TransplantExtension

Yeah, I figured out export/import do what I want, and I'm happy sticking to 
them.  (It's what I was using up until now.)

Pull is probably fine for yanking batches of dozens of commits, but for one or 
two at a time it seems much more heavyweight than necessary.

Thanks for pointing me at the extension.

Rob
-- 
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds