future of HgKit
Theodore Tso
tytso at mit.edu
Mon Oct 5 12:52:13 CDT 2009
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 05:42:14PM +0100, Tom Widmer wrote:
> Theodore Tso wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 11:10:20AM +0100, Tom Widmer wrote:
> >> Well, it's not necessarily worth it, since it will be GPL and thus not
> >> distributable with Eclipse.
> >
> > News flash. Distributions ships Eclipse and other GPL components
> > (including hg) on the same CD-ROM, and no one has ever tried to sue
> > them over it. You know, because it's legal to do so....
> >
> > - Ted
> > (Who is amazed at how many legally
> > ignorant people who are insisting on
> > promulgating the same myths on the
> > mailing list over and over again.)
>
> Apologies for my imprecise language - I meant distributable as an
> Eclipse plugin.
That's still false. Plugins can call CLI's without causing GPL to
infect the plugin source code.
Otherwise what do you think happens when a proprietary unix shell
(such as can be found on Solaris, AIX, HPUX, etc.) runs a GPL'ed
program like gcc or emacs, either from the user's terminal or from a
shell script?
- Ted
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list