qnew ignores -u unless username is configured
Kyle Altendorf
kyle.altendorf at gmail.com
Mon Nov 9 17:23:45 CST 2009
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Martin Geisler <mg at lazybytes.net> wrote:
> Kyle Altendorf <kyle.altendorf at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> It appears that the qnew command ignores the -u option unless I have
>> set a username in one of my config files. [...]
>>
>> Certainly I will just specify a username for now but am I doing
>> something wrong or is this a bug?
>
> It is a bug, thanks a lot for the detailed report. I've fixed it in
> f16ec85f125c, so please try again with a release candidate that says
>
> Mercurial Distributed SCM (version 1.3.1+362-f16ec85f125c)
>
> or higher, that is 1.3.1+X-blabla with a higher X.
>
Sorry for the delayed response. I just setup Mercurial from source
(much easier than expected... :] ) and it looks good (but you
already knew that). Thanks for the extremely quick response. I'm
impressed as usual.
Thanks,
-kyle
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list