pure-python mercurial

[Weijun Wang]

I though it's the commit command which is slow.

TK Soh wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:44 AM, TK Soh <teekaysoh at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Weijun Wang <Weijun.Wang at sun.com> wrote:
>>> Matt says the worst performance degradation happens to base85. You can
>>> try adding a big binary file into your repo and see how slow it can be.
>> Will try that. Thanks for the note.
> 
> BTW, I wonder if diff'ing large binary file will be enough to tell how
> slow it will get.
> 
>>> Max
>>>
>>> TK Soh wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Weijun Wang <Weijun.Wang at sun.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks for the tip, but looks like the --pure option is meant for this
>>>>>> too. I will give it a try.
>>>>> I find out that changing the "PURE=" at the top of Makefile to
>>>>> "PURE=--pure" also works.
>>>> I just installed using --pure, and it seemed to work fine. I also
>>>> don't feel any significant slow down when using TortoiseHg on it
>>>> (running the regular 'day-to-day' functions) so far. Granted,
>>>> TortoiseHg is not a fastest kind of GUI itself ;-)
>>>>
>>>> It's going take more time to get the real feel on this, but I can live
>>>> with it so far.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for a good work.
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial