Promoting the use of Mercurial; was: Re: gnome dvcs survey results
Benoit Boissinot
benoit.boissinot at ens-lyon.org
Fri Jan 9 15:14:07 CST 2009
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:05:36PM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Freitag 09 Januar 2009 18:22:47 schrieb Alexander Belchenko:
> This makes the bzr dev community look still smaller: 4 main committers who do the brunt of the work (but all 4 very actively
> committing):
>
> > = Bazaar churn =
> > john -bei- arbash-meinel.com 245992 ********************************************
> > mbp -bei- sourcefrog.net 217457 **************************************
> > robertc -bei- robertcollins.net 186870 *********************************
> > Aaron Bentley 165001 ********************************
> > andrew.bennetts -bei- canonical.com 68116 ************
> > v.ladeuil+lp -bei- free.fr 42179 *******
> > ian.clatworthy -bei- internode.on.net 35963 ******
> > bialix -bei- ukr.net 9809 *
> > ... [noone below this gets a star] ...
>
> Does anyone know who of those is paid by Canonical?
mbp, robertc and obviously from the email address andrew.bennetts, but
we don't know how many time they devote to bzr during their paid hours.
For the others, I don't know (I don't think John and Aaron were employed
by canonical, at least in 2k6 they weren't).
By the way this criticism can be found in ohlo too:
http://www.ohloh.net/p/bazaar
But since the import of the bzr history looks buggy it probably doesn't
mean anything useful (they only found 3 devs).
They might commit patches in their name with the patch author listed in
the commit message too (I didn't check your data).
regards,
Benoit
--
:wq
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list