Promoting the use of Mercurial; was: Re: gnome dvcs survey results
Arne Babenhauserheide
arne_bab at web.de
Fri Jan 9 02:23:20 CST 2009
Am Freitag 09 Januar 2009 03:45:05 schrieb Theodore Tso:
> No argument here that sometimes Canonical doesn't 'get' Free Software,
> and that not merging Bzr and Hg was singularly unfortunate. Although
> the argument I would use is not Bzr's openness (bzr's license is
> GPLv2, and the possibility of relicesing it is just as hard as any
> other OSS project) --- but rather whether bzr's development community
> would be viable if Mark were to ever pull the plug on funding its
> development team.
Please have a look at the hg-vs-git-vs-bzr code_swarm and note the number of Bazaar Developers.
- http://rakjar.de/shared_codeswarm/project_activity_battle_swarm.html
For direct information in here I added the results of hg churn for Bazaar, Git and Mercurial (I converted all repos to hg
and then used hg churn):
= Bazaar churn =
john -bei- arbash-meinel.com 245992 ********************************************
mbp -bei- sourcefrog.net 217457 **************************************
robertc -bei- robertcollins.net 186870 *********************************
aaron.bentley -bei- utoronto.ca 76958 *************
abentley -bei- panoramicfeedback.com 71284 ************
andrew.bennetts -bei- canonical.com 68116 ************
v.ladeuil+lp -bei- free.fr 42179 *******
ian.clatworthy -bei- internode.on.net 35963 ******
aaron -bei- aaronbentley.com 16759 **
bialix -bei- ukr.net 9809 *
... [noone below this gets a star] ...
= Git churn =
junio -bei- hera.kernel.org 434272 **********************************
junkio -bei- cox.net 211219 ****************
gitster -bei- pobox.com 86001 ******
spearce -bei- spearce.org 75500 *****
Johannes.Schindelin -bei- gmx.de 39284 ***
normalperson -bei- yhbt.net 36338 **
paulus -bei- samba.org 31404 **
barkalow -bei- iabervon.org 26751 **
torvalds -bei- ppc970.osdl.org 24884 *
torvalds -bei- osdl.org 21262 *
chriscool -bei- tuxfamily.org 18726 *
nico -bei- cam.org 17058 *
jnareb -bei- gmail.com 15255 *
vmiklos -bei- frugalware.org 14908 *
... [noone below this gets a star] ...
= hg churn =
mpm -bei- selenic.com 85360 ******************************************
thomas -bei- intevation.de 23068 ***********
vadim.gelfer -bei- gmail.com 20573 **********
brendan -bei- kublai.com 18665 *********
bos -bei- serpentine.com 17446 ********
alexis -bei- cecm.usp.br 17281 ********
dirkjan -bei- ochtman.nl 15185 *******
benoit.boissinot -bei- ens-lyon.org 14109 ******
pmezard -bei- gmail.com 12248 ******
hopper -bei- omnifarious.org 8126 ***
mason -bei- suse.com 7475 ***
mathieu.clabaut -bei- gmail.com 6436 ***
blacktrash -bei- gmx.net 4470 **
tyuyu -bei- debian.or.jp 3103 *
jake -bei- edge2.net 2902 *
stefano.tortarolo -bei- gmail.com 2458 *
peter.arrenbrecht -bei- gmail.com 2424 *
... [noone below this gets a star] ...
The results show that
* Mercurial has far fewer changed lines than bother other projects (this might just be related to a more focussed
development style, though)
* Bazaar has 3 main contributors who account for most of the changes and 7 supporting ones (at least 1 star)
* Git has two main developers, everyone else is left far behind. Even Linus only gets about two stars, though - they have
far more changes in there.
* Mercurial has a broader community of people who have a considerable effect on the development, but the main coding
is done by Matt. And while this information is fresh: Thank you for your great work on Mercurial, Matt!
Could you check who the paid Bazaar developers are, and what would happen if they were to leave?
Best wishes,
Arne
--
-- Ein Würfel System: http://1w6.org - einfach saubere (Rollenspiel-) Regeln.
-- Infinite Hands: http://infinite-hands.draketo.de - singing a part of the history of free software.
-- My stuff: http://draketo.de - stories, songs, poems, programs and stuff :)
-- PGP/GnuPG: http://draketo.de/inhalt/ich/pubkey.txt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20090109/a5741c88/attachment.pgp
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list