RFC: Would you care if mq stopped storing patch files physically on disk?

[Patrick Mézard]

Le 01/12/2009 13:04, Afriza N. Arief a écrit :
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Dilip M <dilipm79 at gmail.com
> <mailto:dilipm79 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Sune Foldager <cryo at cyanite.org
>     <mailto:cryo at cyanite.org>> wrote:
>     > On 01/12/2009, at 06.47, Dilip M <dilipm79 at gmail.com
>     <mailto:dilipm79 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> I _feel_ Mq is killer feature of HG and it should be more
>     improved for
>     >> windows
>     >> too.
>     >
>     > It is, and I use it all the time (on Windows), so forgive me for
>     asking:
>     > what's wrong with it or lacking on Windows?
> 
> 
> How to easily handle conflict after update/checkout other revision, the
> same way "hg rebase" works. maybe "hg qrebase"?

You can already use rebase on the applied queue.

--
Patrick Mézard