RFC: Would you care if mq stopped storing patch files physically on disk?

[Afriza N. Arief]

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Dilip M <dilipm79 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Sune Foldager <cryo at cyanite.org> wrote:
> > On 01/12/2009, at 06.47, Dilip M <dilipm79 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I _feel_ Mq is killer feature of HG and it should be more improved for
> >> windows
> >> too.
> >
> > It is, and I use it all the time (on Windows), so forgive me for asking:
> > what's wrong with it or lacking on Windows?
>

How to easily handle conflict after update/checkout other revision, the same
way "hg rebase" works. maybe "hg qrebase"?

There is no problem..I need to find the way to do hg qpush -a and hg
> qpop -a using gui.
>

You can do that using TortoiseHg 0.9
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20091201/48b12a6e/attachment.htm>