Advocacy vs. git

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

Am Dienstag 28 April 2009 13:09:00 schrieb Hans Meine:
> It would be great if there was a way to keep track of "shared" changesets,
> i.e. ones that I were already pushed or cloned, such that editing them
> should be prohibited (or warned about).  AFAICS it's not safely possible
> (in particular, anyone with a local login can clone my world-readable repo
> without me knowing it), but when everyone pushes/pulls to/from a shared
> central repo, it might be feasible (and useful).

Wouldn't it be possible to just assume that default-push is where we share 
changesets to, so we can call "outgoing" and treat all reported changesets as 
non-shared ones? 

That's not perfect, but it would helpa void common mistakes. 

Best wishes, 
Arne

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 
   - singing a part of the history of free software -
              http://infinite-hands.draketo.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20090428/3ce250e8/attachment.pgp