mercurial gpl license prevents adoption at eclipse.org ?

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

Am Mittwoch 15 April 2009 17:21:22 schrieb Matt Mackall:
> And these folks are GPL plus proprietary. We're not going to do that
> either.

Kudos for that stance! 

By the way: If I'd take the load of contacting every contributor and asking if 
he'd allow licensing his contribution under GPLv2 or later, would you allow 
relicensing of your parts under GPLv2+? 

Best wishes, 
Arne
-- 
-- Ein Würfel System: http://1w6.org - einfach saubere (Rollenspiel-) Regeln.
-- Infinite Hands: http://infinite-hands.draketo.de - singing a part of the 
history of free software.
-- My stuff: http://draketo.de - stories, songs, poems, programs and stuff :)

-- PGP/GnuPG: http://draketo.de/inhalt/ich/pubkey.txt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20090415/c5f5162c/attachment.pgp