hg verify problem

[Benoit Boissinot]

On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Ilmar Wilbers <ilmarw at simula.no> wrote:
> Benoit Boissinot wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Ilmar Wilbers <ilmarw at simula.no> wrote:
>>> This is likely due to better consistency checks in Mercurial, which is
>>> fine.
>>>
>>
>> I think this was downgraded to be a warning instead of an error.
>>
> You mean in development versions of hg? Because 1.0.2 definitely gives an
> error?

Yes, you could try the main tree from selenic.com.

regards,

Benoit