History-less repository?
Arne Babenhauserheide
arne_bab at web.de
Fri Sep 19 01:35:43 CDT 2008
I think if you can split a bigger SVN repository into many smaller project-
repositories and people only have the history of the projects they currently
work on, you actually get better security.
In that case, every laptop contains only the parts which would have been in
the Subversion repository anyway (though with history), and possibly far less
data others could steal.
There is nothing you can do to keep one of the people with access to the
repository from outright stealing - they could just as well copy the entire
subversion tree with all history.
But per-project repositories with access rules (only the ones who work on the
project part may clone it) could improve security in that case, too.
What would do more additional damage: Stolen history of a subtree or a stolen
snapshot of all data?
That aside, I'd go with Giorgos: Just encrypt all laptop data, so a stolen
laptop is no longer an issue.
Best wishes,
Arne
--
-- My stuff: http://draketo.de - stories, songs, poems, programs and stuff :)
-- Infinite Hands: http://infinite-hands.draketo.de - singing a part of the
history of free software.
-- Ein Würfel System: http://1w6.org - einfach saubere (Rollenspiel-) Regeln.
-- PGP/GnuPG: http://draketo.de/inhalt/ich/pubkey.txt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20080919/ef26ca5b/attachment.pgp
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list