[ANNOUNCE] hg describe extension (bug fixed)

[Hans Meine]

On Samstag 18 Oktober 2008, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > *I* didn't strip the copyright; Michael did.  I don't know what that
> > means in your country.
>
> Good to know.  I wasn't implying that you stripped the copyright info.
> My apologies if what I wrote seemed like that.

IANAL, but AFAIK the copyright line merely states who wrote the code (and thus 
who is the one to be asked about license changes), it does not mean that that 
person claims any rights (i.e. the rights are there, independent of the 
line).  Thus, removing Michael's name may not be a good idea at all (since it 
makes future changes of the code's license much harder or legally impossible 
if I understood that correctly).

Ciao, /  /                                                    .o.
     /--/                                                     ..o
    /  / ANS                                                  ooo

PS: Also, I have read many times that (c) alone is technically meaningless, 
one should always include the *word* "copyright".
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20081018/e2d68e0b/attachment.pgp