hg pull (with branch name)

[Alex Van Boxel]

On Sat, 31 May 2008 15:06:09 +0200, "Mads Kiilerich"
<mads at kiilerich.com> said:

> > Omitting the branch name from the update is not correct. Am I correct?
> Yes. You have to specify once which branch you want to see in your 
>
> working directory. The branch name is not needed next time you pull and 
> update within the branch.

Thank, that answers my question. So the behaviour of the "mercurial
plug-in" for Hudson is wrong then (it always pulls the branch from a
clean working directory and doesn't do the update to the branch).

Thanks again.

  _/
 _/ Alex Van Boxel