Tools survey

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

Am Donnerstag 10 Juli 2008 17:34:46 schrieb John D. Mitchell:
> The most crucial, IMHO, is the fact that it doesn't ask the
> respondents to note which of the tools they have actually used.  So

I had that problem in a discussion with a Git user (in the GNU Hurd mailing 
list). 

He had never used Mercurial but claimed, that it couldn't ever be as powerful 
as git... It grew into a quite long discussion. 

-> If you want to follow it: 
- Initial message: 
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2008-05/msg00112.html

- And here the thread began to grow long :) : 
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2008-05/msg00128.html

- And spanned into the next month: 
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2008-06/msg00001.html

- A short summary at the bottom of the following message: 
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2008-06/msg00112.html

(though that summary was discussed again afterwards, as was to be 
expected :) )

Best wishes, 
Arne

-- Weblog: http://blog.draketo.de
-- Infinite Hands: http://infinite-hands.draketo.de - singing a part of the 
history of free software. 
-- Ein Würfel System: http://1w6.org - einfach saubere (Rollenspiel-) Regeln

-- PGP/GnuPG: http://draketo.de/inhalt/ich/pubkey.txt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20080710/69956c5c/attachment.pgp