OT: Distributed bug tracking?
Peter Arrenbrecht
peter.arrenbrecht at gmail.com
Thu Jan 3 02:01:14 CST 2008
On Jan 2, 2008 11:56 PM, Jens Alfke <jens at mooseyard.com> wrote:
>
> On 2 Jan '08, at 12:32 PM, Paul Sargent wrote:
>
> > It strikes me that if the bug information was part of the source tree
> > (with a web interface somewhere so that users / managers can still
> > access it) then the information would be exactly where the developer
> > needed it.
>
> This is a great idea. I've daydreamed about the possibility of using
> hg as the backing store for a wiki, which is somewhat similar.
Same here. I was just yesterday looking into the possibility of adding
an hg backend to Trac. It's SQL-based, but maybe routing the writes to
both hg and SQL and adding some post-pull/push hooks to the hg repo
for replaying the changes against the SQL would do the trick.
Good thing about ikiwiki is it already handles merge problems. Would
have to be added to Trac. On the other hand, Trac is very nice and
full-featured.
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list