1.0 approaches

[Matt Mackall]

On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 21:36 -0800, John D. Mitchell wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2008 9:17 PM, Bela Babik <teki321 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > In my opinion, named branches in their current form do more harm than good.
> > ...
> > > I'd be inclined to discourage their use strongly in 1.0 (maybe relegating
> >
> > I strongly disagree. It is true, that it is more like a dynamic
> > tag than a branch, but it helps to a lot.
> 
> Then changing the naming to make that reality clear would be okay to you?

The time for such non-backward-compatible changes has long since past so
there's not much point to this conversation.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.