git 1.6 compared to hg 1.1 ?

[Arne Babenhauserheide]

Am Montag 29 Dezember 2008 16:23:42 schrieb Benoit Boissinot:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab at web.de> 
wrote:
> > I just did some tests to compare the commit speed, this time using a
> > Mercurial without all the extensions I activated over time (they slow
> > down the start time, and most of them aren't really needed for most
> > workflows).
> >
> > On each run all files where changed except for the run where I
> > explicitely state that only two files where changed.
>
> How fast is "hg version" ? Or python -c "print hello world" ?
>
> So we can compare with the python startup time.

$ time python -c "print 'hello world'"
...
real    0m0.051s

$ time hg version
...
real    0m0.118s

Best wishes, 
Arne
-- 
-- My stuff: http://draketo.de - stories, songs, poems, programs and stuff :)
-- Infinite Hands: http://infinite-hands.draketo.de - singing a part of the 
history of free software.
-- Ein Würfel System: http://1w6.org - einfach saubere (Rollenspiel-) Regeln.

-- PGP/GnuPG: http://draketo.de/inhalt/ich/pubkey.txt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20081229/cc7ab5d0/attachment.pgp