Feature request: mark "dead ends"
Marijn Vriens
marijn at metronomo.cl
Mon Dec 1 09:47:05 CST 2008
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Hans Meine
<meine at informatik.uni-hamburg.de>wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> in one of my repositories I have checked in some changeset X for feature A
> which I could never made to work. Later, I have restarted from X's parent
> and
> some dozens of revisions later I finished the same feature A in another
> way.
> Now I have this extra head with the unfinished changes which I don't need
> anymore.
>
> This extra head gets in my way when using "hgview" (it always appears at
> the
> very top, although it is very old).
>
> AFAICS, I have three options:
> 1) Use a dummy merge to make the unnamed branch inactive. That would look
> like I actually used code from my first try, which I did not.
> 2) Use strip/mq/convert etc. to remove this head from my repo. I have no
> intention to do this.
> 3) Leave it as it is, and try to fix hgview for example.
>
> I would like to have option 4) - mark the branch as inactive without
> merging
> it. Apparently, this is not yet possible with hg, right?
>
> What do you people think? (I bet most people are content with opion 1, but
> what do you think about 4?)
+1
I also have these dead artifacts floating arround. I have been stripping
them out (method 2), but it's far from ideal (history loss).
Regards,
Marijn.
>
>
> Have a nice day,
> Hans
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20081201/53070b14/attachment.htm
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list