Getting better summary from hg incoming
Peter Arrenbrecht
peter.arrenbrecht at gmail.com
Sun Apr 20 02:01:30 CDT 2008
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Doug Philips <dgou at mac.com> wrote:
> On Friday, April 18, 2008, at 01:21PM, "Giorgos Keramidas" wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:36:47 -0400, "Paul Chiusano" wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> Is there a way I can customize what information is presented by the
> >> incoming command? I'd like to know not just which files were touched
> >> by the changesets, but how they were altered - like whether they were
> >> added, deleted, or renamed. Like, if I do: hg incoming, I'd like to
> >> see something like:
> ...
>
> >> Is this possible?
> >
> >Hehe! That's interesting, indeed :)
> >
> >I've written short wrappers around incoming and outgoing to see only
> >*minimal* information and then browse the changes of a bundle later,
> >which is kind of the inverse operation:
>
> And speaking of 'incoming' output :) is anyone else confused/annoyed by
> the fact that hg log and hg incoming show the history reversed from each
> other? I'd really like to see a switch to log so that I can see the newest
> stuff last (as incoming shows it), rather than having to remember to use
> -l or pipe through head....
Adrian already hinted at it below, but to make it explicit: Instead of
using head to see the most recent bunch of entries, you can just use
`hg log --limit`.
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list