Uncommitted changes and merge
Giorgos Keramidas
keramida at ceid.upatras.gr
Thu Sep 6 06:53:25 CDT 2007
On 2007-09-06 13:16, Peter Arrenbrecht <peter.arrenbrecht at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes.
>
> That was a bit short. Care to elaborate? I have the same woes
> as Lars, and so far mq has not solved my problems. In
> particular, it seems to not handle binary files.
Binary files can be handled ok by MQ if you set it up to use
--git style patches. For example, here's a snippet from the
~/.hgrc file on my laptop:
[defaults]
qnew = --git
qrefresh = --git
email = --git
> And I think it is difficult to untangle a bunch of changes into
> disparate patches after the fact. So when you get carried away
> changing unrelated stuff, mq does not help, I think.
It's not very difficult, but it could be easier.
If you have a local patch which touches:
foo/bar
foo/baz
blah/whatever
You can split the patch in two parts with:
hg qpush patchname
hg qref -I foo/baz
hg qnew -fm 'second patch part' patch2
The "-I" option of "hg qrefresh" refreshes the patch to include
*only* the files you specified with the filename pattern
following it, and you can use as many of them as needed.
hg qref -I foo/baz blah
hg qnew -fm 'second patch part'
It may not be as easy to split patches ``per-hunk'', however :(
> "hg record" looks more like a viable solution to me, but alas
> it is only slated for release in 0.9.5.
Indeed :-)
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list