sub-module support

[Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi)]

Darcs - not much Open Source traction, I think because of haskel
Bazaar - atleast based on performance numbers not up to mercurial, plus
we like open source, allows me to customize and contribute. 
Monotone - again based on performance. Plus mainly because I see better
traction/adoption with Mercurial. And most importantly, I hear its much
cleaner code, which is important if we need to be able extend it.

Sarvi

     -----Original Message-----
     From: Jens Alfke [mailto:jens at mooseyard.com] 
     Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 8:00 PM
     To: Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi)
     Cc: mercurial at selenic.com
     Subject: Re: sub-module support
     Importance: High
     
     
     On 7 Oct '07, at 11:45 AM, Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi) wrote:
     
     > The choices are obviously between GIT and Mercurial.
     
     Hm, 'obviously'? IMHO, Monotone, Bazaar and Darcs are 
     worth a look too.
     (Though I personally have settled on Mercurial.)
     
     --Jens