Copying vs of cloning?
Jens Alfke
jens at mooseyard.com
Wed Oct 3 12:09:21 CDT 2007
On 3 Oct '07, at 9:59 AM, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> push, probably not. Local clone, yes it would (it just hardlinks by
> default).
True, but hard-linking isn't a backup :) and cloning isn't
incremental. If using Hg for backups, you should use 'hg push' to a
repository in a secure location. In that case, if your source repo
gets corrupted that badly, the push will fail so the damage won't
propagate to the backup, which is a definite benefit over a regular
backup system!
--Jens
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list