Concatenating changesets

[Martin Marques]

Peter Arrenbrecht escribió:
>> I agree with this completely. However, I often find that a given range
>> of changesets need to be considered as a set or they make little sense
>> on their own (i.e the logical steps to developing a larger change). This
>> brings me to a feature that I think would be really useful: some concept
>> changeset 'grouping'.
> 
> Couldn't tags be used as a poor man's substitute for this, as in tag
> "feature-xy" means this is where feature xy is complete? Although I do
> realize this might clutter up the tag space a bit.

But it would be very dificult to revert the changes. If the changes are 
grouped, you could, for example, backout the whole group.